Legal Opinion

Lewald v. York Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 21, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the subject matter is such that the court should not assume jurisdiction. It invokes the rule of forum non conveniens.

The action is by three preferred stockholders of York Ice Machinery Corporation, a Delaware corporation, now merged with defendant, another Delaware corporation, to determine whether such stockholders, who had dissented from the merger and had demanded payment for their stock and had appointed an appraiser, but had not completed the appraisal proceedings, can now revoke their dissent and obtain…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Williams v. Green Bay & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maybruck v. HaimDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. TBK Partners, Ltd. v. Western Union Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API