Legal Opinion
Teaupa v. U.S. National Bank N.A.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided December 22, 2011No. Civil No. 10-00727 JMS-BMKPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT U.S. NATIONAL BANK, N.A.’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ “MOTION TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND TO AMEND COMPLAINT”; AND (3) REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO NON-SERVED DEFENDANTS
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On January 5, 2011, Plaintiffs Kuli Teaupa and Salóte Teaupa (“Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) against Defendants “U.S. National Bank N.A.” (which has ap*1088peared as “U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grant v. Shapiro & Burson, LLPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Amina v. WMC Fin. Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
- Watoshina Compton v. Countrywide Financial CorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Newcomb v. Cambridge Home Loans, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Menashe v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.