Legal Opinion

Board of Trustees of Policemen's Pension Fund v. Schupp

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 24, 1928PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Drury, Commissioner

Affirming.

By the judgment appealed from, the trial court sustained the validity of chapter 119 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1926, and adjudged that the appellees, Schupp et al., were entitled to the benefits of that act accruing on and after the 16th of June of that year, the date that that act 'became effective, and the board of trustees of the policemen’s pension fund of the city of Louisville, which we shall refer to as the board, has appealed.

In 1912 the General Assembly passed an act (Aets 1912, c. 112) providing for the pensioning of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Commonwealth v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Aitken v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Hardy v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. City Louisville v. Commonwealth for School BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Klein v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Luhrs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Sweesy v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API