Legal Opinion

Vernon v. Lake Motors

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1971No. 12334PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff brought this action against Lake Moto'rs, seller, and Ford Motor Company. manufacturer, for damages to his Mercury automobile which was ruined by a fire which originated under the dashboard. The plaintiff based his case on the theories of breach of warranty and of negligence. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, the trial court granted motions for directed verdict in favor of both defendants and discharged the jury. He rejected defendants’ contention that the plaintiff had failed to make a case on the issue of breach of warranty, but based his ruling on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stickle v. Union Pacific R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Newton v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bahlman v. Hudson Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Chapman v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1961
  5. Challis v. HartloffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cornell Drilling Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Ventura v. Ford Motor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  4. Mulherin v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Genetti v. Catterpillar, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API