Legal Opinion

Mulherin v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1981No. 17027PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

Plaintiffs appeal in this tort ease presents two issues: alleged error in denying a motion for new trial on the basis of evidence newly discovered in plaintiffs subconscious, and the effect of a defense of misuse on a claim based on strict liability.

The injury occurred when plaintiff, an employee in mining operations, stood on a winch manufactured by defendant in order to detach chains securing drainage hoses. During that operation, a hose came in contact with the winch’s throttle-control handle. This started the winch, whose unexpected operation severed plaintiff’s left leg…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. George BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Y & O PRESS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Coney v. J. L. G. Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Owens v. Truckstops of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API