Mulherin v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OAKS, Justice:
Plaintiffs appeal in this tort ease presents two issues: alleged error in denying a motion for new trial on the basis of evidence newly discovered in plaintiffs subconscious, and the effect of a defense of misuse on a claim based on strict liability.
The injury occurred when plaintiff, an employee in mining operations, stood on a winch manufactured by defendant in order to detach chains securing drainage hoses. During that operation, a hose came in contact with the winch’s throttle-control handle. This started the winch, whose unexpected operation severed plaintiff’s left leg…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- George BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Y & O PRESS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Coney v. J. L. G. Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Owens v. Truckstops of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.