Legal Opinion

Newton v. Oregon Short Line Railroad

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1913No. 2459PublishedCited by 58 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. George G. Armstrong, Judge. Action by Erank W. Newton, against Oregon Short Line-Railroad Company. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFeign, J.

Tbis is an action brought by appellant, as father, to recover damages for the death of his son, a minor, which it is alleged was caused through the negligence of the respondent in operating its engine and cars at a street crossing in Salt Lake City. The acts and omissions constituting the negligence alleged in the complaint and relied on at the trial, in substance, are: That respondent carelessly and negligently ran and operated an engine, to which were attached two freight cars, in a certain street in Salt Lake City at a high and dangerous rate of speed, and at a speed in excess of that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Smith v. Mine & Smelter Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Cromeenes v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Rogers v. Rio Grande Western Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Bates v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Gray F. Madison, Sr., and Elizabeth B. Madison, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs v. Deseret Livestock Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  2. Stickle v. Union Pacific R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Department of Finance v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Toomer's Estate v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Devine v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1955

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API