Legal Opinion

Smith Company v. Dickinson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1914No. 11535PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered June 20, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial before the court, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, C. J.

— This action was commenced by M. E. Smith & Company, a corporation, against O. Dickinson and Ida Williams, copartners, on an account for merchandise sold and delivered. From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, the defendants have appealed.

Respondent, a foreign corporation, has filed no copy of its articles of incorporation with the secretary of the state of Washington, nor has it paid an annual license fee to the state of Washington. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 3714 (P. C. 405 § 347), requires the payment of an annual license fee by every corporation incorporated under the laws of this state, and by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tallapoosa Lumber Co. v. HolbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Lilly-Brackett Co. v. SonnemannWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Belle City Manufacturing Co. v. FrizzellIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
  4. People ex rel. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Alto v. Hartwood Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Indian Ref. Co., Inc. v. Royal Oil Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Macario v. Alaska Gastineau Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Procter & Gamble Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API