Legal Opinion

Rich v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1904No. 4812PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King ■county, Morris, J., entered June 30, 1903, quashing the ■service of a summons upon a foreign corporation.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, C. J.

The appellant, plaintiff below, brought this action in the superior court of King county against the respondent, The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company, to recover for wrongs and personal indignities inflicted upon himself and his family by the agents, employes and servants of the respondent while he was, with his family, riding upon the respondent’s train on a ticket purchased at Kansas City, Missouri, entitling him to ride to Seattle, in this state. The wrongs occurred, according to the allegations of the complaint, at Lincoln, Nebraska, and consisted of compelling the appellant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. Leidigh & Havens Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Crose v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Pacific Typesetting Co. v. International Typographical UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Zimmers v. Dodge BrothersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1927
  4. Alto v. Hartwood Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Macario v. Alaska Gastineau Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API