Modroo v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 Mary J. Modroo, the Estate of Mamie J. Hardy (collectively, Modroo), and Cassius H. Hardy appeal from the District Court’s rulings on several motions for summary judgment and motions to dismiss. We reverse and remand.
¶2 We restate the issues as follows:
¶3 Did the District Court err when it concluded that Mamie was not *264an “insured” under the Farmowners policy?
¶4 Did the District Court err when it determined that Hardy lacked standing to pursue his negligence claims against Nationwide?
¶5 Did the District Court err when it determined that Modroo was not entitled to medical payments coverage…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- James L. Ticknor Janet Ticknor Larry Ticknor Tickco Holding, L.L.C. Ticknor Lodging Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Oliver v. Stimson Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Tidyman's Manangement Services Inc. v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Giacomelli v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- United National Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FreyerMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Newman v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.