Legal Opinion

McKibbin v. McKibbin

California Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1903No. S.F. No. 2495PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Plaintiff brings the action for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty, and had the judgment, from which and from the order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appeals. There is no brief on file for respondent.

1. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, defendant moved for a nonsuit, which being denied, he now urges the ruling as error.

It appeared from plaintiff’s testimony that, prior to her marriage with defendant, she had been lawfully married to one Hiram P. Lake, and that at the time of her marriage to defendant Lake was still living. It is urged that plaintiff was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. McGownIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Tomle v. HamptonIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Brigham v. HughsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Mauldin v. Sunshine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Smith v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API