Olsen v. Dixon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
This is a suit to enforce specific performance of a parol contract between the plaintiffs and James L. White, now deceased.
In effect the contract was one which provided that White should dispose of all his property by will, designating plaintiffs as sole beneficiaries under the will in consideration of personal services they were to render to him during his lifetime.
At the trial, after counsel for plaintiffs had made his opening statement, objection was made to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that the complaint fails to state facts constituting a cause of actiod. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. HoagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Stellmacher v. BruderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Chapel v. ChapelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Andrews v. AikensIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Happel v. HappelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Matheson v. GullicksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Hanson v. BowmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Downing v. MaagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.