Legal Opinion

People v. Laney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2004No. Docket 124532PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, a federally licensed gun dealer, sold a pistol to an undercover sheriffs deputy licensed to purchase the firearm, under circumstances strongly indicating that the deputy was purchasing the firearm on behalf of an underage, unlicensed individual. As a result, the prosecutor charged defendant with violating MCL 750.223(1), a misdemeanor. That statute proscribes selling a pistol without complying with the licensing requirements set forth in MCL 28.422(5). The district court, concluding that defendant had complied with MCL 28.422(5), dismissed the charges against him, and the circuit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. ThousandMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. KruegerMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. CarlsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. LaneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. SchaeferMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People of Michigan v. Edward Michael CzuprynskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Attorney General v Eli Lilly and CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Grimes v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API