People v. Laney
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMurray, P.J.
We granted leave in this case to determine whether it is a question of fact for a jury to *27decide whether a licensed gun dealer violated state law by verifying that he sold a pistol to a licensee, when the facts plausibly show that the licensee was acting as a so-called “straw man” for a person unauthorized to purchase the pistol from the dealer. Because the unique facts of this case present a jury submissible issue regarding who the pistol was actually “sold to,” we reverse the order of the circuit court and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2372, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4240 United States of America v. Mary Peggy Moore, United States of America v. Lee Roy WileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- People v. GilmoreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. LaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. LaneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. LaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 2004