People v. Krueger
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
Defendant was charged with and convicted by a jury of one count of first-degree criminal sexual conduct 1 and one count of attempted second-degree criminal sexual conduct. 2 He appeals, claiming that he was deprived of his constitutional 3 and statutory 4 right to be present at trial when the trial judge removed him from the courtroom while the complainant testified.
We conclude that under MCL 768.3 a defendant has a right to be physically present at trial. The trial judge’s decision to remove this defendant from the courtroom while taking testimony from the complainant constituted error…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. ElstonMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. DouglasMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. FeezelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. MusserMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. PeltolaMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. BarbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.