Legal Opinion

People v. Krueger

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2002No. Docket 117375PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Defendant was charged with and convicted by a jury of one count of first-degree criminal sexual conduct 1 and one count of attempted second-degree criminal sexual conduct. 2 He appeals, claiming that he was deprived of his constitutional 3 and statutory 4 right to be present at trial when the trial judge removed him from the courtroom while the complainant testified.

We conclude that under MCL 768.3 a defendant has a right to be physically present at trial. The trial judge’s decision to remove this defendant from the courtroom while taking testimony from the complainant constituted error…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. ElstonMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. DouglasMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. FeezelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. MusserMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. PeltolaMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. BarbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API