Legal Opinion

People v. Carlson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2002No. Docket 118915PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was charged with third-degree criminal sexual conduct (esc m), but the district court refused to bind the defendant over to stand trial. The circuit court affirmed. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for clarification of the district court judgment. Because the district court’s decision in this matter, perhaps based on dicta in People v Patterson, 428 Mich 502; 410 NW2d 733 (1987), may have been improperly influenced by a view that the prosecution had to present evidence that defendant “overcame” the victim, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MassMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. JusticeMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. KlineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. AlterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Colucci v. McMillinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. People v. LaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. PhelpsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. People v. HarlanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API