Legal Opinion

Green v. Burrows

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Muskegon. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This is a suit against Robert Pierson, Charles E. Burrows and Erank E. Jones upon the following instrument :

“$250.78. Whitehall, Mich., May 20, 1875.
“ Sixty days after date I promise to pay to the order of Burrows & Jones two hundred and fifty and -f^ths dollars at Lumberman’s State Bank, Whitehall, Mich., for value received with interest after due at ten per cent, per a.rmnm.

Robert Pierson.”

Upon the back of this instrument was indorsed the following: “We guaranty payment of the within note at maturity without protest. Burrows & Jones.” The evidence showed that this guaranty was indorsed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waldron v. HarringMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pattillo v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Mangold & Glandt Bank v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. First National Bank v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Russell & Co. v. KlinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API