Legal Opinion
Mangold & Glandt Bank v. Utterback
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 11, 1916No. 6028PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error from County Court, Caddo County; C. Ross Hume, Judge. Action by the Mangold & Glandt Bank against W. T. Utterback. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MATHEWS, C.
In October, 1910, the defendant purchased from the Denver-Laramie Realty Company certain shares of stock in said company and executed his note to said company in payment for same. On August 14, 1911, the note was renewed, and after-wards transferred to the plaintiff in error. A copy of the note with indorsements is as follows:
“$1,000.00. Denver, Colorado, August 14, 1911.
“December 14, 1911, after date, I promise to pay to the order of Denver-Laramie Realty Company one thousand & no/100 Dollars, for value received-. Payable at First State Bank of Binger, Okla., -with…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Trust Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Heard v. Dubuque County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- Kellogg v. Douglas County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- Markey v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- German American Savings Bank v. HannaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cady v. Bay City Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Adolph Ramish, Inc. v. WoodruffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- First Nat. Bank of Dalton v. CummingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- M. J. Wallrich Land & Lumber Co. v. EbenreiterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Mothersead v. WileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.