Waldron v. Harring
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Hillsdale circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant upon a guaranty of collection upon.a promissory note of one hundred dollars. The note *494was made by William R. Bennett, dated December 13, 1868, and. payable six months after date to I. M. Eotaling, or bearer, with use. Defendant Earring, being then the bearer, sold the note to one Mitchell on the 30th day of February, 1869, and endorsed thereon the following guaranty: “For value received I guarantee the collection of the within note. E. E. Earring, February 30, 1869.” Plaintiff afterwards became bearer of the note, and having sued the maker and failed to collect it…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Springfield Lighting Co. v. HobartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- State ex rel. Hobart v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Gale v. MayhewMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Aiton v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Edgerly v. LawsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.