Legal Opinion

Russell & Co. v. Klink

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Lenawee. (Howell, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Action was brought before a justice of the peace by plaintiff, as a corporation, to recover from the defendant a balance claimed to be due on a promissory note which, with the endorsements thereon, are as follows :

“ $160.00. Weston, Mioh., Sept. 6, 1879.

On or before the first day of December, 1881, for value received, we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of Arbuclde & Ryan, Toledo, Ohio, four hundred and sixty dollars, payable at C. C. Wakefield & Co.’s Bank, Morenci, Mich., with interest, and if not paid when due, at eight per cent, per annum from maturity, payable annually,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Green v. BurrowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McNary v. Farmers' Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Mangold & Glandt Bank v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Crump v. BerdanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API