Commonwealth v. Blankenstein
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
The appellant was convicted on an indictment for sedition which offense was made a felony by the Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 639, as amended by the Act of May 10, 1921, P. L. 435. The indictment contained eight counts charging different acts prohibited by the statute. The conviction was had on all of the counts, but the sentence imposed was less than that which might have been lawfully given under any single count and the verdict must therefore be affirmed if the law and the evidence support a judgment on any count. Many of the assignments are not in conformity with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Debs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Hester v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Stevenson v. Ebervale Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Campbell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Ardesco Oil Co. v. GilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- McCullough v. Holland Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Davis v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.