Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Holland Furnace Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1928No. Appeal, 56PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

McCullough, the plaintiff in this case, was injured in a collision with the motor truck of the Holland Furnace Company, defendant, and brought an action to recover the damages sustained. A verdict was rendered in his favor, upon which judgment was entered, and this appeal followed. The only assignments of error referred to in the statement of questions involved, and pressed on argument, relate, to the admission of the testimony of one Krantz, who gave evidence as to the earning capacity of plaintiff, and to this complaint alone reference need be made in disposing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. Ebervale Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Allegro v. Rural Valley Mut. Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. DeHaas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. White v. Western Allegheny RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Ardesco Oil Co. v. GilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Laubach v. HaighSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API