Legal Opinion

Spada v. Port of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 7, 1981No. A7911-05549, CA 19748PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

• This is an action for breach of contract. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted. ORCP 47. Defendant moved for summary judgment on alternative grounds: first, that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and, second, even if the court had jurisdiction, defendant was entitled to summary judgment on the merits. The record does not reflect which was the trial court’s basis for granting the motion.

The first difficulty encountered, although not raised by the parties, was the use of a motion for summary judgment to question the trial court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Comley v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Western Amusement Co., Inc. v. City of SpringfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ortwein v. SchwabOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. White v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MacHunze v. Chemeketa Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Merten v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Luyet v. EhrnfeltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Gibson v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Alcutt v. Adams Family Food Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API