Legal Opinion

Ortwein v. Schwab

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1972PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Petitioners have attempted to file a petition in this court for a writ of mandamus, commanding the Court of Appeals to accept, without payment of the $25 filing fee, a petition for review of administrative orders. They request they be permitted to file the petition without payment of the filing fee for this court. Petitioners filed affidavits stating facts indicating indigency and alleging they were unable to pay the filing fee in either court.

Petitioners are welfare recipients and seek judicial review of decisions of the State Welfare Division reducing their welfare payments. ORS 183.480…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United Mine Workers v. Illinois State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Ex Rel. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Cole v. STATE BY & THROUGH OR. DEPT. OF REV.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Smith v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Marquam Investment Corp. v. BeersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API