Legal Opinion

Merten v. Portland General Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 24, 2010No. 051213506; A137350PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, P. J.

This is an action for fraud. Plaintiff filed a workers’ compensation claim for injuries to his shoulder and back that he sustained while working for defendant. Defendant denied the claim for both injuries but later accepted plaintiffs claim for his shoulder injury. Plaintiff then filed this action seeking economic and noneconomic damages from defendant, alleging that defendant fraudulently promised to open plaintiffs back claim. Defendant moved for summary judgment on two grounds: first, that plaintiffs claim was subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Workers’ Compensation Board under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Moustachetti v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Global Executive Management Solutions, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2017
  2. Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Reeves v. Recontrust Co., N.A.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  4. Alcutt v. Adams Family Food Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Rogue Advocates v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API