Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Carll

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 29, 1951PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hazleton, S.

The testator left him surviving as his distributees his widow and son. Under the paper writing which has been offered for probate, he bequeathed the greater portion of his estate to his sister and designated her as the executrix. The widow and son have appeared in the proceeding by the same attorney, and the son has filed objections. An examination of the sole surviving subscribing witness was held pursuant to section 141 of the Surrogate’s Court Act and the said examination has been concluded.

A motion has been made in behalf of the widow and son for the examination before trial…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. In Re the Estate of BurridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of FrankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. In re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of ZimmermanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1918

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of VeederNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of SalkindNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of BaumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of GoldmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of PeterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API