Legal Opinion
In re the Probate of the Will of Eschen
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided February 13, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hugh S. Coyle,
County Judge and Acting Surrogate. An examination of proponent as an adverse party before trial will be permitted as to the execution of the propounded instrument (Matter of Goren, 203 Misc. 609; Matter of Veeder, 7 Misc 2d 662); as to the testamentary capacity of decedent (Matter of Korn, 265 App. Div. 987; Matter of Tanner, 185 Misc. 994); as to the fraud and undue influence allegedly practiced upon the testator (Matter of Frank, 165 Misc. 411; Matter of Kaplan, 193 Misc. 129; Matter of Kreutzburg, 185 Misc. 995); and as to the mental and physical condition of testatrix at,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re the Estate of FrankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- Crellin v. Van DuzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Angell v. BoothNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- In re the Probate of the Will of VeederNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
- In re the Probate of the Will of KreutzburgNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of ReynoldsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971
- In re the Estate of SchneierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975