Legal Opinion

Toth v. Osceola Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1914No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Houghton; Cooper, J., presiding. Case by John Toth against the Osceola Consolidated Mining Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Plaintiff, a man 38 years of age, came to this country from southern Europe in the year 1909. His entire adult life had been spent in the performance of ordinary labor, except for a short time while he was in the army. He was employed by the defendant as a “dirt passer.” The duty of a dirt passer in defendant’s mine calls him to work in the stope with a pick and shovel. The rock, after' it is blasted, must be broken up and shoveled down to a point where it can be loaded into cars. Some of the rock can be shoveled out without being broken, but other pieces are too large to be handled with a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wachsmuth v. Shaw Electric Crane Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Swick v. Ætna Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Meyer v. LadewigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Findlay v. Russel Wheel & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Mushinski v. VincentMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Sheltrown v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Rule v. GiuglioMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Edward McKay and Margaret McKay His Wife v. Ford Motor Company and Michigan Commercial Contracting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API