Legal Opinion

Sheltrown v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928No. Docket No. 112, Calendar No. 33,999PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This action is brought to recover the damages sustained by plaintiff, due to a personal injury while in the employ of defendant. He had verdict for $7,000. The record discloses that a judgment was entered thereon on the following day. The court, however, afterwards, on defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, set aside the verdict and the judgment and entered one fox; the defendant. Plaintiff seeks review by writ of error.

1. It is insisted that the motion for a directed] verdict had npt been reserved by the court and that the judgment first entered is a bar to the after…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wachsmuth v. Shaw Electric Crane Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Lynn v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Anderson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Meyer v. LadewigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Kintz v. GalvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Powers v. VaughanMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Kelley v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Nichols v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Rule v. GiuglioMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Raridan v. BickMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API