Legal Opinion

Canton Cotton Mills v. Bowman Overall Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1923PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

*21These suits were brought to. recover damages for breach of alleged contracts for the sale of cloth goods for future delivery, the defendants having refused to receive the goods, their defenses being, in substance: (1) That the alleged contracts were never bindingly completed; (2) that they were not with complainant Canton Cotton Mills, the manufacturer, but with the Farish Company, not as agents of the complainant, but as principal; and (3) that they were breached by the complainant in that it failed to ship and tender to defendants the quantity or quality of goods called for.

The chancellor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Bates v. CashmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. State ex rel. College of Bishops of M. E. Church v. Board of Trust of Vanderbilt UniversityTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Ault v. DustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Meckleburg Real Estate Co. v. Kyoleum Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance Company of America v. City of White House, Tennessee, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Ballard v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  3. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HayTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Hammond v. Herbert Hood Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API