Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Hay
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice GreeN
This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (chapter 123 of the Acts of 1919), brought by the employee directly against his employer’s insurer, as section 45 of said statute authorizes. An award was made in favor of employee by the trial court and the insurer has appealed.
The employee drove a laundry wagon in the service of the Model Steam Laundry, a corporation doing business at Nashville. The employee, in the course of his duties, was charged with the care of his horse and it was necessary for him to be about the stables of his employer frequently.
While in the stables in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- King v. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Canton Cotton Mills v. Bowman Overall Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- McFarland v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Meade-Fiber Corp. v. StarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sweat v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Hartwell Motor Co., Inc. v. HickersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Central Surety & Insurance v. Mrs. Cora Trawick CourtTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Middleton v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- American Employers Insurance v. Knox-Tenn Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.