Ault v. Dustin
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. H. H. Cook, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.
Complainants, who are wholesale merchants at Cincinnati, Ohio, filed this bill in the Chancery Court of Davidson County against the defendants, who are manufacturers of cotton clothesline and rope, at Lawrenceburg, Tenn., to recover damages for the breach of two contracts. A recovery is asked against the defendant, in the first instance, for the breach of a contract to ■ deliver to complainants five thousand dozen cotton clotheslines, ■ and, in the second, for a failure to deliver three thousand reels of cotton rope. The Chancellor found the contracts as alleged, and awarded damages for their…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Moore v. . the Mayor, Aldermen, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Everett v. SaltusNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Duffy v. . O'DonovanNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brady v. OliverTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Strickland v. City of LawrenceburgCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Canton Cotton Mills v. Bowman Overall Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Oklahoma Vinegar Co. v. Carter & FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Quarton v. American Law Book Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.