Massey v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, Justice.
We granted certiorari to review People v. Massey, 707 P.2d 1038 (Colo.App.1985), in which the court of appeals held that pre-sentence confinement credit could not be applied to two concurrent sentences imposed by different judges on unrelated charges filed in different counties. We conclude that the record below does not establish that the defendant is entitled to *20presentence confinement credit, and accordingly remand the case to the court of appeals with directions to affirm the district court’s order denying the defendant additional credit for presentence confinement.
I
On…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Schubert v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Goedecke v. State, Dept. of InstitutionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Urevich v. WoodardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. BrunerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. BlackSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- Anderson v. Colorado State Department of PersonnelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Beecroft v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.