Legal Opinion

State v. Hernandez

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1991No. 18762, 19027PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Raul Hernandez was found guilty by a jury of three counts of delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine, and three counts of violating the 1989 version of the Illegal Drug Stamp Tax Act. See I.C. § 37-2732(a)(1)(A); I.C. § 63-4206(2). He appeals his convictions, challenging the failure of the court to appoint an interpreter, his sentences, and the district court’s denial of his I.C.R. 35 motion to reduce his sentences. 1 We vacate the judgments of conviction and sentences regarding the Illegal Drug Stamp Tax Act because the version of the Act under which Hernandez was…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. ReinkeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. SanchezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. State v. Dameniel Preston OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. HoffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. VasquezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Hernandez v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API