Legal Opinion

People v. Black

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 12, 1996No. 94SC663PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

We granted certiorari to consider whether the court of appeals erred in remanding this case to the trial court to determine whether the parole eligibility scheme, as applied to persons convicted of sex offenses occurring between July 1, 1979, and July 1, 1985, violates the equal protection clause. People v. Black, 894 P.2d 767 (Colo.App.1994). We find no violation of the equal protection clause and therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

I

Defendant Earl S. Black (Black) was' convicted in 1984 of one count of first-degree sexual assault, § 18-3-402, 8B C.R.S. (1978 & 1988…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. CALVARESTSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  2. Thiret v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Dove v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Humphrey v. Southwestern Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. Urevich v. WoodardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. People v. StreanColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. OglethorpeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. StjernholmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People v. DevorssColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API