Legal Opinion
United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 v. Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 17, 2014No. Case No. 14-md-02521-WHOPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 95
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
In this multidistrict antitrust litigation, plaintiffs challenge in their consolidated complaints a settlement between Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Endo”), a distributor of the brand-name drug Lidoderm, Tei-koku Seiyaku Co., its manufacturer, and Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Watson”) a generic drug manufacturer. Plaintiffs allege that when Endo and Teikoku agreed to drop their ongoing patent litigation against Watson, they offered consideration of $96 million…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- In re Aggrenox Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- American Sales Co. v. AstraZeneca LPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.