Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Pub. Utilities Comm'n v. City of Fresno

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 1, 1967No. Civ. 744PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGargano, J.

Appellant instituted this action to set aside a final judgment of condemnation acquired by respondent City of Fresno 'against the Bowen Land Company, Inc., a public utility company. Respondents filed general demurrers to the complaint, which were sustained by the trial court (Judge Thompson) with leave to amend. Appellant, however, elected to rest on its complaint, and after it failed to amend, respondents’ motion for a dismissal of the complaint was granted by the court (Judge Meyers). Appellant appeals from the judgment of dismissal.

Since appellant elected not to amend its complaint, a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. County of Alameda v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Durant v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Television Transmission, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. City of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. PG&E Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Squaw Valley Ski Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. City of Surprise v. acc/lake PleasantArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  4. County of Inyo v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United Water New Mexico, Inc. v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API