Legal Opinion

County of Inyo v. Public Utilities Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1980No. S.F. 23990PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Petitioner Inyo County seeks review of Public Utilities Commission (hereafter PUC) ruling No. 89576, holding that the PUC lacks jurisdiction over the water rates charged Inyo County and its residents by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (hereafter LADWP), a public utility owned and operated by the City of Los Angeles. The county emphasizes the need for PUC regulation because the county’s residents, unable to vote in Los Angeles municipal elections, lack any political leverage to prevent exploitation by LADWP. Devoid of political or judicial remedy, petitioner…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Town of Holyoke v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Durant v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Hansen v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Issac v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Diva Limousine, Ltd. v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API