Legal Opinion

City of Surprise v. acc/lake Pleasant

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2019No. CV-18-0137-SAPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICE CHIEF JUSTICE BRUTINEL, opinion of the Court:

¶1 The Arizona Corporation Commission ("Commission") has broad authority under A.R.S. § 40-285(A) to approve the sale or disposition of a public service corporation's assets. In this special action, we hold that § 40-285(A) does not give the Commission power over a city's exercise of eminent domain. Accordingly, we vacate the portion of the Commission's March 30, 2018 order requiring the public utility to apply for Commission approval of the proposed condemnation.

I. BACKGROUND

¶2 In October 2017, the City of Surprise ("City") entered into a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sears v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. David Stambaugh v. Mark KillianArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Arizona Corp. Commission v. State Ex Rel. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Thomas P. Morrissey v. Logan Stan GarnerArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Manion v. Ameri-Can Freight Sys. Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  4. State v. FaridCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  5. 3 Sl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API