Legal Opinion
Luciano Pisoni Fabbrica Accessori Instrumenti Musicali and Enzo Pizzi, Inc. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 20, 1988No. 87-1344PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
OPINION
This appeal is from an order of the United States Court of International Trade denying an application for attorney fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act because the position of the United States was substantially justified. We affirm.
Background
On September 12, 1984, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) issued an anti-dumping order on pads for woodwind instrument keys from Italy. 49 Fed.Reg. 37,137. Appellants, Luciano Pisoni Fabbri-ca Accessori Instrumenti Musieali and Enzo Pizzi, Inc. (collectively Pisoni), are respectively the Italian…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ssih Equipment S.A. v. United States International Trade Commission and Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Federal Election Commission v. Congressman Charles G. RoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Gavette v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- James Doty and Susan Doty v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Griffin & Dickson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- CEMS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.