Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Harris

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided April 13, 2006No. 14-04-01179-CVPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

EVA M. GUZMAN, Justice.

This is the second time that this case has been before us on the City of Houston’s (“City”) plea to the jurisdiction. In our previous opinion (Harris I)1 we held that plaintiffs Thomas and Chorlottiea Harris, suing individually and on behalf of their minor son Joshua (collectively, “plaintiffs”), had stated a claim under the Texas Tort Claims Act for a defective condition of tangible personal property. We now review the trial court’s denial of the City’s second plea to the jurisdiction. Because the record evidence shows that plaintiffs do not have a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Harris County v. SykesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. WhitleyTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. City of Magnolia 4A Economic Development Corp. v. SmedleyTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Texas Southern University v. Gilford, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  3. City of Weston v. Gaudette, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  4. Entergy Corp. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. University of Texas at El Paso v. Muro, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API