Legal Opinion
Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 7, 2017No. 15-1500 and 16-1012PublishedCited by 128 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McHUGH, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In 2010, Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation (“Lenox”) sued several related corporations — Medtronic, Inc.; Medtronic PS Medical, Inc. (“PS Medical”); Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. (“MSD, Inc.”); and Medtronic Sofamor Danek Co. Ltd. (“MSD Japan”) (collectively, “Defendants”) — for monopolization and attempted monopolization in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Act. 15 U.S.C. § 2. Lenox alleged that Defendants engaged in illegal activity to advance a coordinated, anticompetitive scheme in which a related non-party, Medtronic Sofa-mor Danek USA, Inc. (“MSD…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Requena v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Johnson v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Sandoz v. Cingular Wireless LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Gutteridge v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States of America ex v. Keypoint Government SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.