Legal Opinion

Terpeluk v. Insurance Co. of North America

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1959No. Appeal, No. 425PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

George Terpeluk and his wife, Anna, instituted suit in assumpsit against the Insurance Company of North America on a policy of fire insurance with extended coverage, alleging a loss by windstorm. The company defended on the grounds (1) that the loss was not caused by windstorm and (2) that plaintiffs had failed to comply with a condition of the policy requiring them to commence suit “within twelve months next after inception of the loss”. Defendant’s motion for a compulsory nonsuit was overruled, and its point for binding instructions was refused. The jury returned a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simons v. Safety Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Bonnert v. Pennsylvania Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Hepler, Admrx. v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. O'Connor v. Allemannia Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Bobereski, Adm. v. Ins. Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lardas v. Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Diamon v. Penn Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Brandywine One Hundred Corp. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  4. Fratto v. Northern Insurance Company of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. O'DONNELL v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API