Legal Opinion

Diamon v. Penn Mutual Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1977No. 555PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion for summary judgment. The motion was filed by an insurance company, resisting a claim by its insured.

It is established that “[t]he utmost fair dealing should characterize the transactions between an insurance company and the insured.” Fedas v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, 300 Pa. 555, 559, 151 A. 285, 286 (1930). It is also established that a motion for summary judgment should be granted only in the clearest of cases, which is to say, only when there is no material issue of fact and no doubt about what the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Iron Mountain Security Storage Corp. v. American Specialty Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Joseph Leone, Jr. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. March v. Paradise Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API