Legal Opinion
O'DONNELL v. Continental Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 3, 1962No. 38,366PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Action for $5,000 and interest by Joseph C. O’Donnell and Elizabeth A. O’Donnell against Continental Casualty Company on an accident insurance policy issued by said company upon the life of their brother, James J. O’Donnell, in which they were named as beneficiaries and which provided for payment of the sum of $5,000 in case of the accidental death of the insured. On September 25, 1956, *328the insured sustained injuries in an automobile accident from which he died the following morning.
Defendant did not deny liability on the policy but failed and refused to make payment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Killips v. Putnam Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Little v. Phœnix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Insurance Co. v. BrodieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Allemania Fire Insurance v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Johnson v. Bankers Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Bethesda Lutheran Church v. Twin City Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Thorson v. Rice County District One HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Leo Aimonetto and Genevieve Aimonetto v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Mason v. Spiegel, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.