Legal Opinion

McKay Co. v. Shott Mfg. Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 1, 1937No. 919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEVIN, District Judge.

This is an action for patent infringement. Plaintiff, The McKay Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, is the owner by assignment of U. S. Letters Patent No. 1,-959.032, issued May 15, 1934, to William R. McGowen, and also by assignment of Design Patent No. 91,997, issued April 17, 1934, to Percival Goodman. The 'McGowen patent is for a “Swing” and “relates to swings and more particularly to those of the glider type.” The Goodman patent is for a “Design for a Glider”. The ownership of the patents by plaintiff and the manufacture by defendant of the particular glider…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harman v. ScottDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1950
  2. Connecticut Adamant Plaster Co. v. James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  3. Malsbary Manufacturing Co. v. Ald, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
  4. Petersime Incubator Co. v. Bundy Incubator Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1942
  5. Weisbaum v. GerlachDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API