Legal Opinion
Harman v. Scott
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 1, 1950No. Civ. No. 930PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVIN, Chief Judge.
This is a suit for alleged infringement of letters patent No. 2,142,896 issued January 3, 1939, to plaintiff herein, Hal W. Harman. In his complaint as originally filed, plaintiff alleged infringement of two additional patents. These two patents (Nos. 2,011,484 (Ex. 1) and 2,198,167, (Ex. 3), both to Harman and both “Method” patents) were later withdrawn from the case.
Plaintiff prays for an “injunction against further infringement”; “an accounting for profits and damages” and for his costs.
Defendant challenges the validity of the patent and denies infringement. He prays…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Temco Electric Motor Co. v. Apco Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Parks v. BoothSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Gordon Form Lathe Co. v. Walcott MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Forestek Plating & Mfg. Co. v. Knapp-Monarch Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stamicarbon, N v. V. Escambia Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Engineered Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Applied Mechanical Technology, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1984
- Metalock Repair Service, Inc., and Lois R. Morrison v. Hal W. HarmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Scott v. HarmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. Buffalo-Springfield Roller Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.