Lewis v. Firestone
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.
Originally, this was an action against other makers, under sections 1431-1432 of the Civil Code, for contribution by some of the joint and several makers of a note who, allegedly, were compelled to pay said note. The complaint of R. E. Lewis and Vera M. Lewis, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, sought 7/9 contribution, there being nine makers and two payers. By stipulation it was agreed that defendants, cross-complainants and appellants E. E. Firestone and Olive Firestone, and Irving S. Kravitz, Edith Z. Kravitz and Hardy W. Wallen (hereinafter referred to as appellants)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Clark v. HewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Griggs v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Shunken v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Stodd v. GoldbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Liebersohn v. Ali (In Re Fineberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996