Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Firestone

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1959No. Civ. 5663PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

Originally, this was an action against other makers, under sections 1431-1432 of the Civil Code, for contribution by some of the joint and several makers of a note who, allegedly, were compelled to pay said note. The complaint of R. E. Lewis and Vera M. Lewis, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, sought 7/9 contribution, there being nine makers and two payers. By stipulation it was agreed that defendants, cross-complainants and appellants E. E. Firestone and Olive Firestone, and Irving S. Kravitz, Edith Z. Kravitz and Hardy W. Wallen (hereinafter referred to as appellants)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Clark v. HewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Griggs v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Shunken v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Stodd v. GoldbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Liebersohn v. Ali (In Re Fineberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API