Legal Opinion · Dissent

Suzuki v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1956No. 28,125Published

1DissentDavidson, Judge

If there be any provision in law whereby a club or corporation may engage in operating a pool hall, or a representative thereof may operate a pool hall for and in behalf of such club or corporation or its members, I know nothing of it. I confidently assert that there is no such law. In my opinion, the majority opinion in this case holds to the contrary.

A pool hall is a place where pool tables are used or exhibited for revenue, fees, or gain of any kind. If upon the pool table any money or thing of value is paid or exchanged, the place is a pool hall. Art. 4668, R.C.S.

It is unlawful for any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCombs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Vaiden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API