Legal Opinion

McCombs v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 24, 1932No. 4247PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWielson, C. J.

(after stating the case as above).

In their brief appellants insist it did not appear from appellee’s petition nor from the evidence that appellee was entitled by force of provisions in article 4668, R. S. 1925, on which the suit was based, to the relief granted by the judgment from which the appeal was prosecuted. Said article 4668 is as follows: “No person acting for himself or others shall maintain or operate a pool hall within this State. The term ‘Pool Hall,’ as used herein, includes any room, hall, building or part thereof, tent or enclosure of any kind similar to those named, or any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gollehon v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Vaiden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Taylor v. McQuaryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Suzuki v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API