Legal Opinion

Watson v. Cochran

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 28, 1914No. 8150PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

By the Acts of the Legislature of 1913 (Acts 33d Leg. c. 74) appearing in 4 Vernon’s Sayles’ Tex. Civ. Statutes as Title 107A, it was provided that the commissioners’ court of any county in the state '■‘may when they deem it expedient, and shall when petitioned by ten per cent, of the qualified voters of the county or a number of the qualified voters, equal to twenty per'cent, of the qualified voters of any political subdivision” mentioned in the act, order an election to be held to determine whether or not pool halls shall be prohibited in such county or subdivision thereof. The act then…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. Austin City Cemetery Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. City of Dallas v. Dallas Consolidated Street Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Wade v. NunnellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Ex Parte FrancisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Roper Gilley v. LumpkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hamilton v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Moore v. PlottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Vaiden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Waples v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API